Sprinto alternative with consent
collected and proven.

Consider TryTrustable instead of Sprinto if you need consent collected and proven on your own sites (a banner, tracker blocking and a hash-chained consent ledger) on the same control graph as your DPDP, security and AI evidence. Stay with Sprinto if you want its wider framework catalogue, 300+ integrations and included auditor support.

This is a closer comparison than most. Sprinto covers the DPDP Act, ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, GDPR, SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and markets directly to Indian companies. The practical difference is where consent happens: in a workflow that documents it, or in the product that captures it from the visitor and proves it later.

You need the consent itself, not only the programme around it. Sprinto describes notice and consent workflows and keeping records current^[1]. TryTrustable's consent management platform is the mechanism that captures consent: it resolves the applicable regime per visitor, blocks trackers until the visitor agrees, and writes what each person saw (notice version, language, purposes, time) to an append-only, hash-chained ledger. That record is what a Data Fiduciary produces when asked to demonstrate consent under the DPDP Act.

Notices in the languages your users read. The Act requires notice in English or an Eighth Schedule language. TryTrustable versions notices in 22 languages and records which one each person was shown, which matters when a complaint turns on whether the notice was understood.

Security evidence from your code. The SDK and CI gate run testing in your own pipeline and block the merge on findings at the severity you choose, while attack-path simulation ties open paths back to the controls they defeat. Residual risk on the risk register is computed from live control state rather than entered by hand.

AI you build, not only AI you use. Sprinto lists an AI systems inventory, reviews and risk assessments^[2]. TryTrustable adds judge-scored evaluations of registered models, prompts and MCP servers, with the results evidenced against ISO 42001, the NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act.

Sprinto is the better fit in several respects.

• Framework catalogue. 25+ frameworks automated and 200+ digitised, including RBI SAR for regulated Indian entities^[2]. Our coverage is 25+ regimes.
• Integrations. Sprinto states continuous monitoring across 300+ integrations, with programmable monitors and a custom API^[2].
• Audit support. Sprinto's plans include access to its auditor network and state that its in-house lead auditors guide you through the first audit for every framework on your plan^[2]. We do not offer an equivalent.
• Maturity. Sprinto is an established vendor with a large customer base and a broad set of modules: vendor risk, trust centre, security questionnaires, training. TryTrustable is younger, and our own SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certification is in progress, as the security page says.

If your immediate need is a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit with guidance, and consent is already handled by a separate banner you are happy with, Sprinto is a sensible choice.

The low-risk route is to keep Sprinto for the programme and add Consent by TryTrustable for consent collection and proof, since the two do not do the same job. Moving the rest later is a setting in TryTrustable, not a migration of consent data. We do not claim an automated import from Sprinto.

What carries over is the work rather than the files. The controls you operate today (access reviews, encryption, logging, vendor reviews, incident response) are the same controls in any tool. In TryTrustable each one is mapped once onto a shared control library, and cross-framework mapping carries its result to every regime that asks for it, with partial coverage recorded as partial. Your policies are documents you already own, and your past audit reports remain your records.

What does not carry over is history. Evidence in TryTrustable is timestamped when it is collected, from the day an integration connects, and every framework starts empty: a requirement with no control behind it scores as not modelled, never as met. Keep what you exported from the old tool as a record of the earlier period rather than expecting it to be re-dated. Integrations take read-only scopes, so connecting them changes nothing in your environment.

For the detail behind the TryTrustable column: the full list of regimes we cover, Consent by TryTrustable, the standalone consent management platform, our DPDP Act and Rules 2025 guide and AI governance for ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act.

Comparing more than one tool? We have written the same comparison for the others: TryTrustable as a Vanta alternative and TryTrustable as a Scrut alternative.

This page compares software, and is not legal advice about what any regulation requires of you.