Company

About TryTrustable.
Compliance broke because it was manual.

TryTrustable started with a simple observation: every company we knew was assembling the same evidence, by hand, for the same controls, in a different spreadsheet, and then doing it again for the next framework, and the next country. The work was real. The method was not.

Book a demo See the platform
What is TryTrustable?

A compliance platform where evidence collects itself

TryTrustable runs compliance, security and AI governance from a single control graph. You answer a control requirement once, and the evidence it produces is reused by every framework that asks for the same thing: collected automatically from your systems, hash-chained and timestamped, so an audit is answered from what was actually true rather than reconstructed from screenshots before a deadline.

  • Eleven engines, one shared control set
  • Evidence collected continuously, not assembled before an audit
  • Readiness derived from control results, never hand-set
  • 25+ regimes from DPDP and GDPR to SOC 2, ISO 27001 and the EU AI Act
How a requirement resolvesleft to right
Framework requirementasks
Shared control~45 of them
Checkruns on a schedule
Readinessderived, never set
Who uses it?

Engineering-led companies carrying their second framework

The common shape is a team of 50 to 300 selling across borders that already holds one framework and has just been asked for another: a European customer wanting GDPR and ISO 27001, an enterprise deal stuck in security review, or an AI feature that has attracted EU AI Act questions. MSPs and vCISO practices run it multi-tenant across a whole client book.

  • B2B software companies, typically 50–300 people
  • Already carrying one framework, facing a second
  • MSPs and vCISO practices, multi-tenant
  • Less suited to teams with no CI pipeline: the SDK and merge gate are where much of the value sits
Typical customerthe common shape
Size50–300 people
Shapeengineering-led B2B SaaS
Triggera second framework
AlsoMSP · vCISO
Which problems does it solve?

Six, and they share one control set

Each of these is sold separately by somebody else. The reason they sit together here is that they read and write the same controls, so the second one you turn on is substantially cheaper than the first.

  • Consent you can prove: trackers held before consent, and an append-only ledger behind them
  • Evidence that collects itself: continuous control tests instead of a screenshot hunt
  • A cheaper second framework: one control set mapped across 25+ regimes
  • Security tested, not asked about: SAST, SCA, DAST, IaC and secrets in your own pipeline
  • AI systems governed: inventory, risk tier and evaluation for the EU AI Act and ISO 42001
  • Deals unblocked: a trust portal and questionnaire answers drafted from live control state
Problemengine that answers it
Proving consentConsent manager
Evidence by handEvidence ledger
Second framework costCross-framework mapping
Security questionnairesTrust portal
Why should an enterprise trust it?

Because the architecture is checkable, not asserted

We audit other companies' controls, which makes our own posture the first thing a serious buyer asks about. Everything below is a property of how the system is built rather than a promise about how we behave, which means your security team can verify it rather than take our word.

  • Read-only by default: nothing we run changes state in your environment
  • Tenant isolation at the data layer, enforced by the schema rather than by application convention
  • PII redaction in your process: we receive the shape of a data flow, not the values
  • Hash-chained evidence: an altered record breaks the chain detectably
  • Regional residency, with Indian customer data held in India
  • Readiness is never pre-filled: unmapped requirements score as not modelled, never satisfied
Our own posturecheckable
Integration accessread-only
Tenant isolationdata layer
Evidencehash-chained
Certificationin progress
What we believe

Four rules we actually hold to.

Evidence over assertion

If we cannot show you the artefact, we do not claim the control. That rule applies to our product and to our own posture.

Integrate once

Every capability we ship has to arrive on an SDK bump. If a customer has to edit client code for a feature we built, we designed it wrong.

No fabricated posture

We do not seed demo data that flatters a customer's readiness. An empty dashboard is more useful than an invented one.

Built where the rules are new

DPDP is younger than most of our engineering team's careers. Being close to a regime as it is written is an advantage, not a limitation.

The story

From one audit to twenty-five regimes

We built the first version to get a single customer through SOC 2 without screenshots. The moment they asked for ISO 27001 it was obvious the answer was not a second checklist, it was one control graph that every regime reads from. DPDP arrived while we were building it, and the global regimes followed.

  • Founded in India, serving customers across five regions
  • Product-led: the SDK ships before the sales deck
  • Engineering-heavy team, privacy counsel in-house
  • Product complete and deployed; certification is the gate before first revenue
Where we aretoday
Regimes supported25+
Shared controls45
Requirement mappings700+
Live connectorsGitHub, AWS
01

The name, and what it is not

TryTrustable (written as one word, sometimes typed as “Try Trustable”) is the compliance, security and AI governance platform at trytrustable.com, built in India for teams that answer to several regimes at once. It is a separate company from Trustible (trustible.ai), a US AI governance vendor with a similar name, and it is unrelated to the open-source Trustable software framework. If an article, a directory listing or an AI assistant describes TryTrustable with details that do not match this page, it is almost certainly describing one of those instead.

Our official profiles are LinkedIn, X and Instagram. Anything else claiming to speak for TryTrustable can be checked with us at admin@trytrustable.com.

Questions

The things people ask us

What is TryTrustable?

TryTrustable is a compliance, security and AI governance platform built on a single control graph. You answer a control requirement once and the evidence it produces is reused by every framework that asks for the same thing. Evidence is collected automatically from your systems, hash-chained and timestamped, so an audit is answered from what was actually true rather than reconstructed from screenshots.

Who uses TryTrustable?

Engineering-led B2B software companies, typically 50 to 300 people, selling across borders. The common shape is a team that already carries one framework and has been asked for a second: a European customer wanting GDPR and ISO 27001, an enterprise deal blocked in security review, or an AI feature attracting EU AI Act questions. MSPs and vCISO practices run it multi-tenant across a client book.

Which compliance and security problems does TryTrustable solve?

Six, from one control set: consent you can prove, with trackers blocked before consent and an append-only ledger; evidence that collects itself instead of a screenshot hunt before each audit; a second framework that costs less than the first, through one control set mapped across 25+ regimes; security tested rather than asked about, with SAST, SCA, DAST, IaC and secret scanning inside your own pipeline; AI systems governed for the EU AI Act, ISO 42001 and the NIST AI RMF; and enterprise deals unblocked through a trust portal and questionnaire answers drafted from live control state.

Why should an enterprise trust TryTrustable?

Because the architecture is checkable rather than asserted. Integrations are read-only and change nothing in your environment. Tenant isolation is enforced at the data layer by the schema rather than by application convention. PII redaction runs inside your process, so we receive the shape of a data flow and not the values. Evidence is hash-chained, so an altered record breaks the chain detectably. Data is stored regionally, with Indian customer data held in India. Readiness is never pre-filled: a requirement with no control mapped scores as not modelled rather than satisfied. Certification is in progress and not yet complete, which we state plainly rather than implying otherwise.

Which frameworks and regulations does TryTrustable cover?

More than 25, including India's DPDP Act 2023 and DPDP Rules 2025, the GDPR and UK GDPR, ePrivacy, the EU AI Act, NIS2, DORA, US state privacy laws, LGPD, PIPEDA, Singapore and Thailand PDPA, the Australia Privacy Act, Japan APPI, Korea PIPA, UAE PDPL, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and ISO 42001.

Can we buy only the consent manager?

Yes. Consent by TryTrustable is the same engine as a standalone application with its own dashboard and login, covering the consent ledger, versioned notices in 22 languages, tracker blocking, withdrawal relays and rights handling, without the frameworks, security intelligence and AI governance. It runs on the same control graph, so moving to the full platform later is a setting rather than a migration.

Is TryTrustable the same company as Trustible?

No. TryTrustable (trytrustable.com) is a compliance, security and AI governance platform built in India, covering the DPDP Act, GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act on one control graph. Trustible (trustible.ai) is a separate, unaffiliated US company that sells AI governance software. The names are similar; the companies, products and people are not the same.

Book a walkthrough

Talk to the people who built it.

Demos are run by the team that writes the product, not a sales engineer reading a script.

Book a demo Read the SDK docs